By: Unknown author, published on the Sydney Morning Herald Website (Diet and Fitness). On the 5th October 2011.
http://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/diet-and-fitness/superbroccoli-a-fantastic-achievement-20111005-1l8i2.html
http://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/diet-and-fitness/superbroccoli-a-fantastic-achievement-20111005-1l8i2.html

It would be interesting for this article to be followed up with an investigation into the reasons why people aren’t getting their needed nutritional intake in the first place, and thus the need/place of technological enhancements to counter this phenomenon. A study into the prevention of nutrient related diseases/conditions as opposed to technology which must then cure such occurrences would be an interesting way to view the topic. Also linking an article regarding genetically modified foods such as the ABC’s Catalysts’ report on the future of GM foods http://www.abc.net.au/catalyst/stories/s2062724.htm on webpage would be a clever way of educating the public on the issue, and creating debate within the community.
It’s interesting that you pointed out the similarities between the changing nature of food technologies and new media, it is exactly what I was thinking about while I was reading it. I think there is a strong correlation between the two. This blog is really interesting, specifically because of the way in which the article is written without any assumed knowledge on the readers behalf. I think this will become a really interesting concept over the coming years, will new media cause readers to specialize? Or will they branch out? What effect will that have upon the way in which news articles are written?
ReplyDeletei think this topic is really relevant to Australian audiences, especially considering we are facing being one of the first countries to produce and eat GM wheat.
ReplyDeletealthough there are articles in favour of GM foods i still think it's a dangerous area